It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BIDEN Admin Says LIBERAL WORLD ORDER Will Make Abortions Legal..Keep Inflation Going..and More.

page: 1
16
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:08 PM
link   
Friday, July 1, 2022

As a true old-school racist, the overturning of Roe v Wade by the Supreme Court hit U.S. President Joe Biden especially hard.

To keep the level of Black and Hispanic births from increasing in America (76% of aborted U.S. babies are Black and Hispanic), Biden is taking the extraordinary step of asking the Democrat controlled U.S. Senate to disable the "filibuster", so Congress can make Abortions legal, in all 50 states. Joe Biden calls it "codifying" the ability to kill unborn human children.

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden said Thursday that he would support an exception to the Senate filibuster to protect abortion access.

A shift that comes as Democrats coalesce around an election-year message intended to rally voters who are outraged, or deflated, by the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade.
More at: apnews.com...

President Biden says a "Liberal World Order" is being constructed in America that maintains higher than normal inflation, and apparently, making Abortion-on-demand 100% legal everywhere. And we're learning more about this world order the Biden Administration is constructing, every day.

"Liberal World Order" plan: nypost.com...

President Biden knows that much of what this Congress implements, can easily be deconstructed in January 2023 by a Republican-led Congress.

But it seems that the same people who assured candidate Biden he would be crowned U.S. President, are telling him that Democrats will INCREASE their House and Senate majorities, as a result of the mid-Term elections this coming November.

-CareWeMust

edit on 7/1/2022 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:24 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

I'm slow. I'm not claiming to be smart. But wasn't the entire premise of the removal of Roe. Vs. Wade based on the part where Federal jurisdiction wasn't the correct venue for this topic? Maybe I just don't understand.



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:24 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Not if there is no Republican led Congress.



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:29 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Your OP is false.

Passing a Federal law making abortion legal everywhere in the US is not overriding the Supreme Court. It would be doing exactly what the Supreme Court said to do. By deciding that abortion is not a Constitutional right they turned the issue back to the people to decide. That means that in the absence of a Federal law, each state could decide for itself. But if there was a Federal law that would presumably take precedence over state laws. There is nothing in the Supreme Court decision that prohibits a Federal law on this subject from being passed. If the Repubs controlled both houses and the Presidency, they could pass a Federal law prohibiting abortion everywhere. If the Dems controlled both houses and the Presidency they could come along and nullify that law. This could go on indefinitely. That's what the Supreme Court did in their infinite wisdom--they ensured that we will fight over this incessantly.



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: carewemust

I'm slow. I'm not claiming to be smart. But wasn't the entire premise of the removal of Roe. Vs. Wade based on the part where Federal jurisdiction wasn't the correct venue for this topic? Maybe I just don't understand.


You're thinking about what the U.S. Supreme Court intended.

That's not connected with what the President and Congress want.



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: carewemust

I'm slow. I'm not claiming to be smart. But wasn't the entire premise of the removal of Roe. Vs. Wade based on the part where Federal jurisdiction wasn't the correct venue for this topic? Maybe I just don't understand.


No. The decision was that abortion is not a Constitutional right. That means it can be controlled directly by legislation--pro or con. By either the states or Feds. After being "settled" for 50 years we will now fight over it again for 50 years.



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: carewemust

Not if there is no Republican led Congress.


Right. If Democrats increase their majority, as Pelosi promised Biden they would, Abortions will be "codified" and prices will keep escalating...all by design.



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:35 PM
link   
a reply to: 1947boomer

You should start a thread with that explanation. It makes a lot of sense, and might turn down the liberal's pressure cooker a bit.



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: carewemust

I'm slow. I'm not claiming to be smart. But wasn't the entire premise of the removal of Roe. Vs. Wade based on the part where Federal jurisdiction wasn't the correct venue for this topic? Maybe I just don't understand.


No. The decision was that abortion is not a Constitutional right. That means it can be controlled directly by legislation--pro or con. By either the states or Feds. After being "settled" for 50 years we will now fight over it again for 50 years.


If it was "settled" for 50 years, why was there so much wailing from liberals over TEXAS and LOUISIANA restricting abortions?



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:43 PM
link   
a reply to: 1947boomer



Passing a Federal law making abortion legal everywhere in the US is not overriding the Supreme Court




That means it can be controlled directly by legislation--pro or con. By either the states or Feds.

You speak of the Constitution , then prove that you do not know .
Just the State's decision .
Not anything to do with the US Federal Government whatsoever.
That's what the SCOTUS ruling was about .
The unconstitutionality within Roe v Wade and folks "interpreting" that decision wrongly .


edit on 7/1/22 by Gothmog because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:47 PM
link   
He and everyone yank'n on his strings is a #head, so there's that. Anyone that supports this administration Is dumb AF, prove me wrong lefty's??? You'll lose every time and look like the imbeciles you are. Please.... anyone that supports this # respond and defend your idiocy.



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:51 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Well , Suppose Pedro Jiminez doesn't Make it Up that Rope ?
edit on 1-7-2022 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 06:52 PM
link   
Clearly the Liberals realize if they are going to make their new green world sustainable they need a lot less people in lower classes. Abortion will help that cause.

Give me Avocado Toast or give me death!



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 07:40 PM
link   
They just should come out of the closet already and call it a satanic world order. Nevermind gas prices, moolak needs those sacrifices.
What a joke these clowns are.



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 09:51 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

I remember seeing this in the news. Things need to change or we're doomed.



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 10:50 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Diabolical bastards.
We knew it all along, this is all part of their plan to destroy America.



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 11:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: 1947boomer

No. The decision was that abortion is not a Constitutional right. That means it can be controlled directly by legislation--pro or con. By either the states or Feds. After being "settled" for 50 years we will now fight over it again for 50 years.


Actually, there is a simpler way to go.

The 10th says "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

The recent Court decision says that the Federal government has not been granted authority, under the Constitution, to regulate or permit abortions. Which is correct.

So now states are jumping in to usurp that power to themselves. The Federal government (i.e. Congress) can head this off by passing legislation saying that neither Federal nor State governments have any authority in an individual's medical decisions, provided said individuals are mentally competent to make those decisions.

In other words, like the right to bear arms, it is a right reserved to the people.

This probably won't happen, though. Neither party is really interested in expanding the rights of the people.



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 11:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: carewemust

Not if there is no Republican led Congress.

I am worried about those RINO Republicans led Congress being worried about pushing more for Ukrainian conflict than the people.


Look at how some of the Republicans treated Trump's admin for the past four years they didn't achieve anything.
Only now they are concerned?


edit on 1-7-2022 by vNex92 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 1 2022 @ 11:56 PM
link   
Between now and January is the most dangerous time in History. Get prepared NOW. Democrats are planning the biggest onslaught ever 👁️



posted on Jul, 2 2022 @ 11:40 AM
link   
It would be helpful if folks didn't boil down the "abortion" issue to "yes it is not it isn't" but looked at it in context.



Prior to the need to rid the planet of what Planned Parenthood guru Margret Sanger called "the negro problem" ("they're like weeds") abortion was not considered birth control. Subsequent to that time, a time before most were alive, the system began to change language, unborn babies became "fetus'" and then "viable" then "parasites" and with each shift of language the Human Being in Gestation became an object, not a souled being, which, prior to Maggie Sanger's system to dealing with the Negro Problem had no common language to dehumanize a Humans In Gestation.

Prior to Maggie's arrival, folks knew how children were created, Humans in Gestation, and yes, few were "unwanted" for various reasons, but folks knew SEX led to children and folks were not VICTIMS. The arrival of "have sex with what, who when and how just be free to be" wasn't a thing. This shift is commonly blamed on the Pill and the "Summer of Love" which, remarkably, remarkably, was all just prior to the fakery that was Roe V. Wade.

In the 50 year since the lie that was Roe V. Wade, the entire story was a fabrication which, in true law, negates anything that comes after, the language has been changed to make pregnancy prevention a mystery, and, to make victims out of all that get pregnant. All, everyone is has "forced pregnancy" now, and it is their "right" to undo what horror = language change = victims. Choosing to bring a life to earth automatically makes one a victim in 2022.



Which all makes zero sense, except we add the other components. It creates a perpetual "yes it is no it isn't" war rooted in foolish beliefs. Need proof? The Constitution says what is says, if one SINGULAR case is decided, then it means that singular case has been decided and does not AMEND the Constitution. Yet, folks actually think the document was amended to codify aborting Humans In Gestation. Obamacare isn't a Constitutional right just because Roberts called it a tax.

So what did Roe V. Wade really do? Pay attention: "harvested stem cells" for vax, food products, cosmetics, trafficking in baby parts and more. So the fraud that was Roe vs. Wade and the subsequent mind control efforts to make killing Humans In Gestation acceptable has led to a billions dollar industry out of the body parts.

Consider that. Women who do not want a child, even for legit reasons, have that child taken away and used in products, research, consumption. If grandad or grannie was hauled out of the house just prior to death to be turned into Soylent Green folks would loose their minds, but babies, not so much, even as they themselves consume the products.

Why Roe V. Wade was even needed. Well, again folks fail to see the point because they only consume the talking points and rarely bother to see what is happening. Besides fulfilling Maggie's dream,,, All of the above uses for Dead Humans and their body/parts and cells is not seen as a problem nor can folks really be prosecuted. So, doctors can "kill" Humans In Gestation and have no fear of being in trouble, they just hold their hands up and say "incest rape, woman's right to choose, my body my choice, covers me" and their moral compass is thrown away.

Doctors are to do no harm, but the "laws" have taken away their moral compass entirely and turned them into "yes" men, if it is "legal" and they can make money they are all in.

The next part it covers is to remove the Feminine nature of a woman, so an abortion is akin to throwing away the last half of an unwanted Starbucks latte. Prior to Maggie, nearly all women felt the Human In Gestation living within, many noticed the glow as the soul made appearances with the mother to be, family gathered to love and support the new comer to earth and mom. Now, woman carry a Human In Gestation for months, live with this being THEY THEMSELVES invited to earth, and then dump it without moral conflict.

It is the later that is the biggest problem. A woman who has lost her moral compass in this regard is not a woman, as it is that nurturing moral compass that makes her a woman. Instead she becomes an immoral person detached from soul. But, according to the government goons and ghouls who need to make those body parts available, she's not guilty of anything as long as a doctor does it.

Lastly. Unplanned Parenthood takes a gazillion dollars from the government, then takes that money and donates a ton of that back to the dems, in a very clever money laundering scheme that, were it in the Toxic Waste Disposal Industry that graft would have people screaming corruption, but because of the "yes it is not it isn't" mind control this action is seen as moral, reasonable and supporting a "woman's right to choose."

Did you know the racist Planned Parenthood, founded on racism, did a study in 2019 to determine if the company was racist within the workplace, and found it was? Think about that, a company founded on extermination of a race, was found to be hostile the race it was created to eliminate. Who of thunk it?

Folks need to think about to a world where this never existed, frankly, the world was better, but because most to the screaming harpies have only lived under this sick system of legalizing the trafficking in HUMAN BODY PARTS they have no idea what the world can look like and have been turned into immoral beings shilling for industries that use the dead body parts of Humans In Gestation for products and services same said aborting mothers use.

Consider that: Statistics would say, at least a few women have consumed the cells from their aborted children in some of the products they use, in fact, some may have injected the cells from their aborted child into a child they decided to have though jabs.

"Yes it is not it isn't" isn't a way to view anything, and viewing this topic that way is, frankly, beyond disheartening, it is criminal, or should be.
edit on 2-7-2022 by crankyoldman because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
16
<<   2 >>

log in

join