It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Great Pyramid Hoax Documentary: Episode 2 - Conspiracy and Cover-Up

page: 2
25
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 24 2022 @ 11:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: Scott Creighton

originally posted by: Hooke

originally posted by: Scott Creighton

originally posted by: Hooke


It was a tomb.


The GP ... It was the 'engine room' of their recovery system.

...




So how did that work? What evidence do you have?


When we are finally able to see what is inside the Big Void then, and only then, might evidence be provided to substantiate my theory - or not, as the case may be. Alas, we are likely still many years away from seeing inside the Big Void and knowing its contents.


So that's a "no evidence," then.


The Vyse Chambers, on the other hand, have been accessible for nearly 200 years and their contents well documented, so you should have little problem in backing up your claim, to wit:


Hooke: The apr name was put in place in the mid-3rd millennium. . .


So, I say to you again - prove it.


You'll find a lot of the evidence here.



posted on May, 24 2022 @ 02:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hooke

originally posted by: Scott Creighton

originally posted by: Hooke

originally posted by: Scott Creighton

originally posted by: Hooke


It was a tomb.


The GP ... It was the 'engine room' of their recovery system.

...




So how did that work? What evidence do you have?


When we are finally able to see what is inside the Big Void then, and only then, might evidence be provided to substantiate my theory - or not, as the case may be. Alas, we are likely still many years away from seeing inside the Big Void and knowing its contents.


So that's a "no evidence," then.


Quit the spin. The evidence to support the theory is pending.


The Vyse Chambers, on the other hand, have been accessible for nearly 200 years and their contents well documented, so you should have little problem in backing up your claim, to wit:


Hooke: The apr name was put in place in the mid-3rd millennium. . .


So, I say to you again - prove it.



You'll find a lot of the evidence here.


So - you're just here to promote your book.

Underwhelmed. Really thought you would do better. Not surprised though. Tell you what - present just one piece of evidence (the strongest piece) from your book and watch while it gets torn to shreds on this forum.

Go on - I dare you. But you won't. Because you know you have nothing concrete to back up your claim.

Just trying to promote a book. You don't get a free pass on my forum, sweets. Here we demand evidence. And if all you are here to do is promote your book, you can chase yourself. Must do better.

SC


edit on 24/5/2022 by Scott Creighton because: (no reason given)

edit on 24/5/2022 by Scott Creighton because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 25 2022 @ 03:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: Scott Creighton

originally posted by: Hooke


It was a tomb.


The GP ... It was the 'engine room' of their recovery system.

...





Hooke: So how did that work? What evidence do you have?


...


SC: The evidence to support the theory is pending. The Vyse Chambers, on the other hand, have been accessible for nearly 200 years and their contents well documented, so you should have little problem in backing up your claim, to wit:



Hooke: The apr name was put in place in the mid-3rd millennium. . .



SC: So, I say to you again - prove it.



You'll find a lot of the evidence here.




So - you're just here to promote your book.


It's interesting that you've chosen to interpret my answer in that way.

Just to remind you: you asked for evidence that the apr name in Campbell's Chamber was written in the 3rd millennium.

I replied by indicating somewhere that contains relevant information on the subject about which you were enquiring.

If any readers of that book had any questions, I'm sure that they would be properly addressed.

So do you have any questions, Scott? Why don't you do some "tearing to shreds" on your own account?



posted on May, 25 2022 @ 03:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Hooke

originally posted by: Scott Creighton

originally posted by: Hooke


It was a tomb.


The GP ... It was the 'engine room' of their recovery system.

...






Hooke: So how did that work? What evidence do you have?


...


SC: The evidence to support the theory is pending. The Vyse Chambers, on the other hand, have been accessible for nearly 200 years and their contents well documented, so you should have little problem in backing up your claim, to wit:



Hooke: The apr name was put in place in the mid-3rd millennium. . .



SC: So, I say to you again - prove it.



You'll find a lot of the evidence here.




So - you're just here to promote your book.


It's interesting that you've chosen to interpret my answer in that way.

Just to remind you: you asked for evidence that the apr name in Campbell's Chamber was written in the 3rd millennium.

I replied by indicating somewhere that contains relevant information on the subject about which you were enquiring.

If any readers of that book had any questions, I'm sure that they would be properly addressed.

So do you have any questions, Scott? Why don't you do some "tearing to shreds" on your own account?






So there you have it readers. If you want evidence that the painted marks in the Vyse Chambers of the Great Pyramid were painted there ca.4,500 years ago, you have to buy this individual's book.

Now I know this individual's posting style well enough to know that you will find no such evidence in their book. How do I know this? This person love's nothing more than correcting people or proving them wrong. They are never backwards in coming forwards with evidence to prove they are right. You can see a small example of this on Pg1 of this thread when they link to an article about the 2 German 'students'.

Point is - when this individual has evidence to 'win' a debating point, they will always present it. They will happily shove such evidence down my throat just to shut me up. That they have presented not a single piece of evidence from their book speaks volumes.

So, Hooke - just quit with your hyperbole. You have no evidence - in your book or elsewhere.

Put up and I'll shut up.

SC
edit on 25/5/2022 by Scott Creighton because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 25 2022 @ 03:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Themaskedbeast

I don't know what the GP was for but I am pretty sure if the bottom cave at the base was full of water when the water table was higher, it could be made into a Hydrogen generator within a week. But they would have had to have a use for it, as they didn't have the machinery to cut the stones and drill the holes that of course, cant be there.What else is the electrical effect at the top for.?



posted on May, 25 2022 @ 08:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Scott Creighton


So there you have it readers. If you want evidence that the painted marks in the Vyse Chambers of the Great Pyramid were painted there ca.4,500 years ago, you have to buy this individual's book.

Now I know this individual's posting style well enough to know that you will find no such evidence in their book. How do I know this? This person love's nothing more than correcting people or proving them wrong. They are never backwards in coming forwards with evidence to prove they are right. You can see a small example of this on Pg1 of this thread when they link to an article about the 2 German 'students'.


So, Hooke - just quit with your hyperbole. You have no evidence - in your book or elsewhere.



Just let me know when you've found a piece of evidence in the book that you think is wrong, and I'll reply to you.

If it turns out that your're right and I'm wrong, the point would of course have to be conceded.

You obviously think this would be a no-brainer, so how about it, Scott? Why are you denying yourself such a great opportunity for winning so many arguments all in one go?



posted on May, 25 2022 @ 10:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Hooke

originally posted by: Scott Creighton


So there you have it readers. If you want evidence that the painted marks in the Vyse Chambers of the Great Pyramid were painted there ca.4,500 years ago, you have to buy this individual's book.

Now I know this individual's posting style well enough to know that you will find no such evidence in their book. How do I know this? This person love's nothing more than correcting people or proving them wrong. They are never backwards in coming forwards with evidence to prove they are right. You can see a small example of this on Pg1 of this thread when they link to an article about the 2 German 'students'.


So, Hooke - just quit with your hyperbole. You have no evidence - in your book or elsewhere.



Just let me know when you've found a piece of evidence in the book that you think is wrong, and I'll reply to you.

If it turns out that your're right and I'm wrong, the point would of course have to be conceded.

You obviously think this would be a no-brainer, so how about it, Scott? Why are you denying yourself such a great opportunity for winning so many arguments all in one go?


Clearly you have no intention of presenting any evidence from your book or elsewhere to back up your claim. We can only deduce from your behavior here that you are simply in this ATS Forum to promote your book and have no interest in providing any actual information/evidence to back up what you have claimed. Readers here have to purchase your book.

You have wasted enough of everyone's time.

Back to the thread folks, to wit:



SC



posted on May, 26 2022 @ 12:33 PM
link   
So what's the gist of this? Aliens did it? Man made it? Men didn't make it, but also no proof that aliens did? What does it tackle? What claims does it debunk? What new or interesting discoveries does this put forth?
Can someone sum this up for me, before I invest my time in it?

Thanks.




top topics



 
25
<< 1   >>

log in

join