It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

My pilot thoughts on today's UFO congressional hearing (2nd post just think on it)

page: 5
31
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 21 2022 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: ConMi27

And surely there's some pilot on ATS that has thoughts on this. I mean its Abnormally weird....



Lots of pilots on ATS ConMi27 but unfortunately have never tried it (been in submarines though).

For what it's worth there's some info here about 'pilot under reporting bias' and apparently there are just reasons why a pilot doesn't report his or her UFO sighting.




"There is a [military] publication called JANAP 146E that has a section that says you will not reveal any information regarding the UFO phenomenon under penalty of $10,000 fine and ten years in jail. So the secret has been kept."

Lieutenant Frederick Fox.

Pilot Statements





posted on May, 21 2022 @ 08:48 PM
link   
I hear you.

Valid points.

I think my caution and sudden awareness come from their explicit concern in it. It seems genuine in some aspects and I think the only reason the government woukd openly admit to this is from a point of fear.

Because they don't know.

If its our own tech or even China's tech:
one - they wouldn't admit that China is ahead of us
Two - they wouldn't reveal our advanced tech to others, or risk giving away an advantage or secrets that benefits us

There is absolutely no advantage to coming out with this public forum since more than half then people aren't even believers...

So.
Why.

a reply to: noscopebacon



posted on May, 22 2022 @ 03:39 PM
link   
a reply to: ConMi27
There has been several attempts but no one is willing to risk pilots and hardware from being damaged or put put out of commission anymore.

Everything from 60-70 has been non aggressive excluding non American air assets.
Search for foreign reports and you might get a better understanding of "why not".



posted on May, 22 2022 @ 11:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Factory ConMi27

that was over 60 years ago(the 1960's)

I can with 110% certainty say that we(US) has exotic energy based weaponry and particle beam weaponry(exotic types of matter possible, anything that can be accelerated in a accelerator might have interesting effects when fashioned into a powerful focused beam).

and only God knows what is in the US's black bag.


I would agree back in the early and upto the late 70's we may not have had the ability to intercept these craft in any meaningful way, but now in 2022 and with things i KNOW are possible i think we could bring down these craft but would expose the tech and maybe bring down a 'friendly'.

Any creature with a mind advanced enough to make a craft to get to earth and act the way they do(and we cant replicate, apparently) would know that you enter a clear military exercise and mess with aircraft with weaponry capabilities and than be shocked if you don't respond in a way we could understand as non threatening that they might get shot at.

the Nimitz encounter has always puzzled me, there were dozens of non-responsive objects at 80K feet above a military exercise and even after jets went to look and still could not get a response or an answer to hails and have ZERO launches or armed aircraft or even launching of SA-3's at the targets following you.



go try and buzz an aircraft carrier and see what happens.

you wont even get close before 2 interceptors are on your wing tips.


i was on an aircraft that had some sort of issue where they couldnt hear our responses

and we were intercepted pretty quickly and when they rocked the wings and they started to fall back i was like 'oh this is how i die'.


it turned out our jet flashed the lights at them and responded to the calls from the jet to follow them.


and they knew we were Americans, knew where we were going, and had a filed flight plan in a private jet and still sent up armed interceptors, so why not any of these craft?

i think we could bring them down, but we don't because they are ours(US) and most likely launched from a sub of some type as maybe some super advanced ECM/ISR element.


look up PROJECT PALLADIUM


it was how US subs would release these small mylar 'craft' that could spoof Cuban/USSR radars almost like a wild weasel



here is a 2 min clip from xfiles that i think applies to this very well





edit on 22-5-2022 by noscopebacon because: spelling



posted on May, 23 2022 @ 07:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: Factory
a reply to: ConMi27
There has been several attempts but no one is willing to risk pilots and hardware from being damaged or put put out of commission anymore.

Everything from 60-70 has been non aggressive excluding non American air assets.
Search for foreign reports and you might get a better understanding of "why not".




could you elaborate on that a bit? sounds interesting.

one wonders at what happened during the Cold War over the USSR. they're big, had tech, had nukes, so if there is something/someone flying around, they certainly must have interacted.



posted on May, 23 2022 @ 11:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: karl 12

There is a [military] publication called JANAP 146E that has a section that says you will not reveal any information regarding the UFO phenomenon under penalty of $10,000 fine and ten years in jail. So the secret has been kept.


Karl…..I’ve gone to several online postings of the JANAP 146E in pdf format…..and I can’t find that warning statement…..

Can you provide a link to where JANAP 146 states that warning?

👽🛸🍺
edit on 23-5-2022 by Ophiuchus1 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2022 @ 06:39 PM
link   
a reply to: ConMi27

"Our military is scared or cautious and that should beg you to ask what is going on for them to openly admit this to the public."

The "military" rarely shoots down its own. Unless you claim, the things that fly are aliens...
edit on 23-5-2022 by SpaceBoyOnEarth2 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
31
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join