It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is this proof Ivermectin should be an option?

page: 1
21
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
+6 more 
posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 07:39 PM
link   
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines


and the meat and potatoes:

Conclusions:
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

Keywords: ivermectin, prophylaxis, treatment, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2


If the source is an issue, let me know.



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 07:42 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Anything that cure, prevents spread, provides a therapy or provides immunity should be discussed.


I've heard statements and anyone feel free to verify or deny,
If there is a solution that is already FDA approved, the eua that the current "vaccines" are authorized under can not be used?



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 07:49 PM
link   
c19ivermectin.com/
c19hcq.com

FLCCC - Summary of Evidence (Ivermecton)

Dr. Pierre Kory - Senate Hearing

The evidence is pretty clear that this could obliterate transmission of the virus. There is only one reason to suppress a treatment that is cheap and appears to be effective. They are rolling in cash now, they can just keep printing more and more. They don't want the gravy train to end.
edit on 10/11/2021 by MaplePatriot because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 07:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: network dude

Anything that cure, prevents spread, provides a therapy or provides immunity should be discussed.


I've heard statements and anyone feel free to verify or deny,
If there is a solution that is already FDA approved, the eua that the current "vaccines" are authorized under can not be used?


Ivermectin is an FDA-approved broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent with demonstrated antiviral activity against a number of DNA and RNA viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

NCBI Linky

But just ignore all that... only non-FDA approved pseudo vaccines will be allowed in the US because $$$...




posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 07:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

Ah, one of the smarty pants!

Answer me this Lum, why are they calling the jabs a vaccine when it factually does not provide immunity but suppresses the effects on the body?

Bonus question; do you recall the flu shot ever being referred to as the flu vaccine?



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 07:53 PM
link   

edit on 11-10-2021 by JinMI because: Double mint gum



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 07:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Lumenari

Ah, one of the smarty pants!

Answer me this Lum, why are they calling the jabs a vaccine when it factually does not provide immunity but suppresses the effects on the body?

Bonus question; do you recall the flu shot ever being referred to as the flu vaccine?


They changed the actual definition of "vaccination" to call the current bunch of clot jabs a "vaccine."

To answer you would take a few paragraphs based on politically what the Progressives in the US needed to happen with Covid, who got paid and who got more power.

Most of which you already know...

And for the second question, there is no longer a a need for a flu shot or a flu "vaccination."

Since rather amazingly, only one person in the US died of the Flu lately so it has been eradicated, for all intents and purposes.




posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude



Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin.


This one is a little stronger than the others. Usually it is low-certainty evidence. But still no smoking gun.

edit on 11 10 2021 by tamusan because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 08:06 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI




why are they calling the jabs a vaccine


a very leaky vaccine is still a vaccine



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 08:09 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Like another member said, any proven treatment to get through this pandemic is great!

That being said, I still have trouble understanding the mechanism Ivermectin uses to stop COVID when it was originally used as an anti-parasitic, not an anti viral. That being said, it has shown some efficacy.



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 08:31 PM
link   
a reply to: MDDoxs

Why does it have to do anything with the sars-cov-2 viral particle?
Covid-19 is the immune response to a viral infection, if Ivermectin is helping prevent the overreaction to the infection then it is not interacting directly with the virus. Much like you don't save someone from a bullet wound by removing just the bullet.

The treatment via jabs is not a cure or prevention for a sars-cov-2 it's a forewarning to the body's immune system to prepare to handle the viral infection.

So considering we don't know the exact mechanism for generating a covid-19 response in some but not others perhaps it is because, like the CDC state, 60 million+ Americans have a parasite infection and the viral particle is the tipping point for the immune system.



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 08:41 PM
link   
India "beat" COVID with ivermectin in two of the most densely populated cities on the planet.
Then they banned it?

It's safer than the jabs but there's no money in it.



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 08:45 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

My daughter got the Moderna and recently got Covid. She was symptomatic when she tested and looked to be spiraling fast...faster than I was comfortable with. Anyway, I put her on the MATH+ protocol, right away, and she was 100% within 3 days. I had the ivermectin on hand ahead of time.

I am totally sold on the MATH+ protocol.



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 09:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines


and the meat and potatoes:

Conclusions:
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

Keywords: ivermectin, prophylaxis, treatment, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2


If the source is an issue, let me know.



This is why we didn't use Ivermectin..
The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally
edit on 11-10-2021 by putnam6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 09:33 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude



Is this proof Ivermectin should be an option?


Unfortunately here in Australia that is all irrelevant now as it has been banned and we are now officially living with the tyranny of medical apartheid, and that's just the start.



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 09:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari



Ivermectin is an FDA-approved broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent with demonstrated antiviral activity against a number of DNA and RNA viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).


It's FDA approved as an antiparasitic agent in humans, not as an antiviral agent. Efficacy against covid looks positive but as of yet unproven and unauthorized due to limited and not so thorough real world trial testing.

Read your link more closely.


Despite this promise, the antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven in vivo. While ivermectin's activity against SARS-CoV-2 is currently under investigation in patients, insufficient emphasis has been placed on formulation challenges. [. . . ] these results should be interpreted with caution. Firstly, it is important to note that the drug was only tested in vitro using a single line of monkey kidney cells engineered to express human signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM), also known as CDw150, which is a receptor for the measles virus [10]. Also, ivermectin has not been tested in any pulmonary cell lines, which are critical for SARS-CoV-2 in humans [11]. Furthermore, these authors did not show whether the reduction seen in RNA levels of SARS-CoV-2 following treatment with ivermectin would indeed lead to decreased infectious virus titers.


Addendum: FDA: Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19



But just ignore all that... only non-FDA approved pseudo vaccines will be allowed in the US because $$$...


But just ignore all that, since Pfizer is FDA approved and costs zero to the consumer to receive it.

Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Oh, and Merck makes ivermectin. So Pharma is in on that, too.


edit on 11-10-2021 by SirHardHarry because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 10:02 PM
link   

Biological - SARS-CoV-2 - Medical Treatments
Subject: Ambulatory medical treatment for COVID-19 without the use of vaccines or RNA therapy.
Name of Report: Medical Treatments for COVID-19
Description: Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection

Preface: The following report from the American Journal of Medicine contains the medical facts on in home care and treatment of COVID-19.


DDZ LINK

There's a lot of treatments listed on that report.



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 10:07 PM
link   
a reply to: SirHardHarry

so asking again what is the need for ivermectin to be antiviral? -
The vaccines are not anti-viral as it is proven you still get the infection and can die from the resulting immune system response. Is the immune system response helped/damped by the use of Ivermectin? You don't know but it works 85% of the time.

Until you can prove why some people are not affected by an exposure to the SAR-COV-2 viral particles and some people die from their immune response to an exposure, pharma is clutching at the necks of those dying and squeezing as much profit out of them as they can.

As to the cost to the public, it is the billions that are collected from their wages and given by the government directly to Pharma. Pharma has done nothing out of the kindness of their hearts.

Merck now also makes a $700 pill exclusively and a $1 pill which anyone can make. Which one do they one to be used?



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 10:17 PM
link   
a reply to: puzzled2




so asking again what is the need for ivermectin to be antiviral? -


Covid is a virus, not a parasite.


The vaccines are not anti-viral as it is proven you still get the infection and can die from the resulting immune system response.


The vaccine largely prevents wide-scale hospitalization and death versus being unvaccinated, which is why it's effective. Death from immune system response is rare; benefits greatly outweigh the side effects, as shown, and why it's effective and approved at preventing unwanted hospitalizations and death.



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 11:08 PM
link   


Covid is a virus, not a parasite.

No it's not.




Disease

coronavirus disease
(COVID-19)

Virus

severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
(SARS-CoV-2)
WHO Link


Seems you are missing the point the VACCINE IS NOT ANTI-VIRAL, otherwise you would not be catching it in any form. It is a strengthening of the immune system the jabs do not stop the Viral particles in any form.

a reply to: SirHardHarry


edit on 11-10-2021 by puzzled2 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
21
<<   2 >>

log in

join