It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Even the French and English Are Agreeing The U.S. Being Turned into A Dictatorship By the Democrats/

page: 2
28
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Don't just sing it old timer, provide at least some sort of source for your hairbrained ramblings.
And the french won't be sidekicks for long, you lot will get your #1sidekick status back soon.




It's "hare-brained", whippersnapper.

Do I really have to provide a source that the US spies on everybody?

Get real, man.

So do all intelligence agencies.



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 01:43 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Swing and a miss, no reliable evidence of rigging has been put forward. The Republican Party have accepted and amitted this. The kracken and black-ops server raids was all nonsense. They weren't all for Biden, just the majority- as was epected due to the republicans sayig not to use postal voting. Even the pro republican AZ review found what fraud happened was in favour of Trump. In case you haven't realised Q is the owner of 8chan and his son doing a LARP and My Pillow guy is speaking his usual crackpipe jibberish. It's not real, only nutters believe the 'election was rigged' claims.

Nope LIddle is right-wing Libertarian, I highly doubt you've ever heard of him before your OP or you wouldn't be making such ridiculous claims. He's ex associate editor of Spectator Magazine, has always written for right wing publications and has a a career full of PCC rulings against him for racism, homophobia, islamaphobia, racism and fir being a wind up merchant not concerned with facts.

I don't hate Trump, just thought he was a crap President with no understading of foreign affairs or world politics, he seemed decent domestically and I would have voted for him over Biden as I stated prior to the election. I hate Obama for his fake 'Change' bull# spiel and hate Biden for his complete cowardice and mishandling of Afghanistan.

Leftists only exists in the US, in the adult world people have their own personal politics and don't worship politiciansor parties . If you'd have actually read my post instead of making stuff up you would have realised I was saying wokeism, cancel culture and mandates are akinn to a dictatorship.

Pointing out basic facts like the election wasnt rigged doesn't mean someone is



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 01:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Don't just sing it old timer, provide at least some sort of source for your hairbrained ramblings.
And the french won't be sidekicks for long, you lot will get your #1sidekick status back soon.




It's "hare-brained", whippersnapper.

Do I really have to provide a source that the US spies on everybody?

Get real, man.

So do all intelligence agencies.


www.thefreedictionary.com...
Lol
Nope
But, absolutely expected.
Try again codger.
Being a sidekick is prestigious, with a long and glorious tradition; it is nothing to be ashamed of.



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 02:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Don't just sing it old timer, provide at least some sort of source for your hairbrained ramblings.
And the french won't be sidekicks for long, you lot will get your #1sidekick status back soon.




It's "hare-brained", whippersnapper.

Do I really have to provide a source that the US spies on everybody?

Get real, man.

So do all intelligence agencies.


www.thefreedictionary.com...
Lol
Nope
But, absolutely expected.
Try again codger.
Being a sidekick is prestigious, with a long and glorious tradition; it is nothing to be ashamed of.


Did you not read your own source? "Hare" not "Hair"? Which would make no sense?

Do you not know what a "Hare" is?

As in "mad as a March Hare"?

Try again, whippersnapper.



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 02:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Don't just sing it old timer, provide at least some sort of source for your hairbrained ramblings.
And the french won't be sidekicks for long, you lot will get your #1sidekick status back soon.




It's "hare-brained", whippersnapper.

Do I really have to provide a source that the US spies on everybody?

Get real, man.

So do all intelligence agencies.


www.thefreedictionary.com...
Lol
Nope
But, absolutely expected.
Try again codger.
Being a sidekick is prestigious, with a long and glorious tradition; it is nothing to be ashamed of.


Did you not read your own source? "Hare" not "Hair"? Which would make no sense?

Do you not know what a "Hare" is?

As in "mad as a March Hare"?

Try again, whippersnapper.


< facepalm and sigh >

Just #ing stop. You aren't right on this one, because 'hair' used to be an accepted alternate spelling for 'hare', and if you were half the English student in school as I was, you'd know that part of the etymological history of the damn word.

Also, did YOU read the source? because I did, it says the same god damn thing I just did:



The first recorded use of harebrained dates to 1548. The spelling hairbrained also has a long history, going back to the 1500s when hair was a variant spelling of hare. The hair variant was preserved in Scotland into the 1700s, and as a result it is impossible to tell exactly when people began writing hairbrained in the belief that the word means "having a hair-sized brain" rather than "with no more sense than a hare." While hairbrained continues to be used, the standard spelling of the word is harebrained.



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 02:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Don't just sing it old timer, provide at least some sort of source for your hairbrained ramblings.
And the french won't be sidekicks for long, you lot will get your #1sidekick status back soon.




It's "hare-brained", whippersnapper.

Do I really have to provide a source that the US spies on everybody?

Get real, man.

So do all intelligence agencies.


www.thefreedictionary.com...
Lol
Nope
But, absolutely expected.
Try again codger.
Being a sidekick is prestigious, with a long and glorious tradition; it is nothing to be ashamed of.


Did you not read your own source? "Hare" not "Hair"? Which would make no sense?

Do you not know what a "Hare" is?

As in "mad as a March Hare"?

Try again, whippersnapper.


< facepalm and sigh >

Just #ing stop. You aren't right on this one, because 'hair' used to be an accepted alternate spelling for 'hare', and if you were half the English student in school as I was, you'd know that part of the etymological history of the damn word.

Also, did YOU read the source? because I did, it says the same god damn thing I just did:



The first recorded use of harebrained dates to 1548. The spelling hairbrained also has a long history, going back to the 1500s when hair was a variant spelling of hare. The hair variant was preserved in Scotland into the 1700s, and as a result it is impossible to tell exactly when people began writing hairbrained in the belief that the word means "having a hair-sized brain" rather than "with no more sense than a hare." While hairbrained continues to be used, the standard spelling of the word is harebrained.


So, you're stuck in Scotland in the 1700's.

Hares aren't called hairs anymore but quite frankly I really have better things to do than argue the toss with you about it.
edit on 7-10-2021 by Oldcarpy2 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 02:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Don't just sing it old timer, provide at least some sort of source for your hairbrained ramblings.
And the french won't be sidekicks for long, you lot will get your #1sidekick status back soon.




It's "hare-brained", whippersnapper.

Do I really have to provide a source that the US spies on everybody?

Get real, man.

So do all intelligence agencies.


www.thefreedictionary.com...
Lol
Nope
But, absolutely expected.
Try again codger.
Being a sidekick is prestigious, with a long and glorious tradition; it is nothing to be ashamed of.


Did you not read your own source? "Hare" not "Hair"? Which would make no sense?

Do you not know what a "Hare" is?

As in "mad as a March Hare"?

Try again, whippersnapper.


< facepalm and sigh >

Just #ing stop. You aren't right on this one, because 'hair' used to be an accepted alternate spelling for 'hare', and if you were half the English student in school as I was, you'd know that part of the etymological history of the damn word.

Also, did YOU read the source? because I did, it says the same god damn thing I just did:



The first recorded use of harebrained dates to 1548. The spelling hairbrained also has a long history, going back to the 1500s when hair was a variant spelling of hare. The hair variant was preserved in Scotland into the 1700s, and as a result it is impossible to tell exactly when people began writing hairbrained in the belief that the word means "having a hair-sized brain" rather than "with no more sense than a hare." While hairbrained continues to be used, the standard spelling of the word is harebrained.


So, you're stuck in Scotland in the 1700's.

Hares aren't called hairs anymore but quite frankly I really have better things to do.



For Christ's sake, the point is BOTH spellings are acceptable -- harebrained, and hairbrained. Even my Firefox spellcheck has both as acceptable, neither is underscored as incorrect here.



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Nyiah

I'll leave you to it. You seem to have mistaken me for someone that gives a monkey's.



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 02:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Nyiah

I'll leave you to it. You seem to have mistaken me for someone that gives a monkey's.


You nitpicked ShooterBrody first over it, and embarrassed yourself in the process by being wrong. Evidently, you gave a toss enough to mouth off incorrectly in the first place.



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 02:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Nyiah

I'll leave you to it. You seem to have mistaken me for someone that gives a monkey's.


Maybe yer just arebrained and airbrained at the same time 🤣



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 02:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Nyiah

I'll leave you to it. You seem to have mistaken me for someone that gives a monkey's.


You nitpicked ShooterBrody first over it, and embarrassed yourself in the process by being wrong. Evidently, you gave a toss enough to mouth off incorrectly in the first place.


T & C's regrettably preclude me from telling you where to go so, ta ta, matey.
edit on 7-10-2021 by Oldcarpy2 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Nyiah

I'll leave you to it. You seem to have mistaken me for someone that gives a monkey's.


Maybe yer just arebrained and airbrained at the same time 🤣


Hilarious.



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: bastion

blah, blah, blah, no evidence all fake news, blah, blah blah, Trump deranged syndrome, blah, blah, blah. Sorry to rain on your parade but more than enough evidence was found of fraud. The only "crackpipe gibberish" comes from the same people whom actually believe 80 million plus Americans voted for a real deranged pedophile whom likes to sniff women and children, and can't remember where he is most of the time and forgets what he was talking about mid sentence...

Biden and Harris were caught first telling the truth about what they were going to do, which has been to stop all leases on oil, gas, and coal extraction and admitted they would ban oil extraction including fracking, which would mean the destruction again of millions of jobs, not to mention the increase in prices in electricity, gas, etc.

Then they both were caught lying claiming they would not ban fracking, oil extraction, etc. Then they changed their minds again, before the election, and stated that the people do not deserve to know what their policy stances are until after people voted for them... But you want to claim 80 million plus Americans voted for that?... ROFLMAO...

Show me ONE Biden rally that was full, JUST ONE. Even Hillary got her rallies more full than Biden's, and Hillary's rallies were always half empty at the least...

Right before the election Biden couldn't get even 10 million followers in either twitter or Facebook, and before you start claiming "that's not a good way to measure how many Americans would actually vote for him," or some other such nonsense back in 2019 there were around 220 Million Americans using Facebook alone. But biden couldn't get even 10 million followers even on Facebook?...

Then we saw, and I posted evidence as it was happening that Youtube was deleting dislikes to Biden's videos, then suddenly Facebook, Youtube, Twitter began adding followers to Biden many which i am willing to bet are the real "bots" to get people to believe Biden got now about 14 million followers.

Any thinking adult would have realized a long time ago that Biden couldn't get so many Americans to vote for him. It's simply impossible. More so when millions of former democrats turned Trump supporters and youtube was full of videos of these people and the movement known as "walkaway."

As for the fraud found in the elections. Only fools would continue to claim these days there was no fraud. If there was no fraud why keep away official observers 30-150 feet away when they are supposed to handle each and every ballot to certify they were legit?...

Even when the supreme courts of states ordered officials to allow observers to be close and to observe, they were still denied to verify ballots...

GOP observers granted court order to watch vote counting in battleground Pennsylvania

If there was no fraud why was it that on the early night of November 3rd Trump had a huge margin and the next few days millions of votes came from out of the blue. we also all saw, and it was covered on ATS as it was happening how over 130,000+ votes that were for Trump were taken off and given to Biden starting around 4 AM November 4th?

Why was the signature verification software lowered to 40%? Any intelligent person would know if you lower the verification for signatures to less than chance it would allow millions of fake signatures to be passed as legit... Imagine if banks decided to lower their signature verification to 40%, would there be more bank fraud or less?...

Not to mention that there were witnesses, including truckers, whom stated they were given stacks of sealed ballots to be transported from New York to Pennsylvania. The reports of democrat voters being told that they could leave states like New York go to Georgia for a couple of months change their address, vote there and then after the election those people could return to their states.

Despite the lies from the mainstream media, which have been debunked in these forums several times, more than enough evidence was found of fraud. As for your claim that the fraud favored Trump?... ROFLMAO... You have to be a fool to believe that and believe that Biden whom couldn't get any of his rallies as full as Hillary's and much less full than Trump's rallies would receive 80 million plus votes...

Not to mention, as I wrote in another thread about voter fraud...

First, i would have to question the legitimacy of using "Cyber Ninjas" a company that has ZERO experience with such audits...

Second, there is enough evidence that there was enough fraud to have given the vote to Biden.

Notice this image from the first draft of the report.



Arizona election audit draft report leaked and Trump says media already trying to spin it for Biden AGAIN

According to the hand count President Trump lost in Maricopa by around 45,469

Yet the draft report states the severity from medium to critical of inaccuracies found amount to:

23,344+10,342+9,041+3,432+2,592+2,382+2,081 = 53,214

That's more votes than Biden supposedly got over President Trump.

What's more, the media has been already claiming before the end of this audit that Biden won... Despite the fact that on September 24th the Arizona Senate referred the Maricopa election audit to state attorney general for further investigation...

Arizona Senate refers Maricopa election audit to state attorney general for further investigation

The claim that there wasn't enough voter fraud found is false, and the investigation is continuing.










edit on 7-10-2021 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 07:39 PM
link   
a reply to: bastion

BTW, we also saw how Pelosi and company saved Pelosi's nephew Newsome's election by stealing votes. 70% of republicans who went to vote were told they had already voted when that wasn't truth, and even when this was found they certified that fake election. This sort of thing happens in socialist and communist countries like Cuba, Venezuela, etc...

Everything Biden has done has been wrong and is destroying the economy, and he said he was going to do all of this, but you want to claim that there are 80 million plus Americans whom are stupid enough to vote for such lunatic as Joe Biden and democrats?...

BTW, i haven't even mentioned how several states ignored their own laws which state only the legislature of a state can change election rules, yet in 5-6 states (the states that gave the victory to Biden) the election laws were ignored and non-legislature officials changed the laws illegally. That's also not mentioning the fact that Trump won those states, such as Florida and Ohio among others, which POTUS that have always won also won in the past.

And as i wrote in yet another thread:

As for the election?... The Arizona audit found plenty of evidence. Perhaps you forget that even Fox News, which has turned more and more left except for a couple of hosts, claimed that Biden won before all the counting was done. We saw ourselves how observers were kept away 30-150 feet away. We saw how in certain places Republican observers and lawyers were ousted and the poll workers cheered this, which proves in some of the places that suddenly gave Biden the win there was no unbiased counting or verification.

Only one party, and a couple of RINO sell outs, helped steal the election to Biden. Not to mention that even with all the steal, and the ballots that were found thrown away, and we even had videos of a couple of poll workers filming themselves stating "this is what i do when I see a ballot for Trump, which one such ahole of yours showed one ballot that had the name of Trump and the voter voted for him and the poll worker ripped the ballot completely...

As far as i know the only thing that Lindell wasn't able to prove was that the Chinese had helped, even though there was at least one video in which a Chinese person called to China, and you can hear them talking and that Chinese person which posted the video translated what was being talked about. It showed ballots for the U.S. presidential election and according to the translation the person in China was saying we can make many more like this, or something like that.

How easily do left-wingers/anti-Trumpers forget that we all saw how President Trump was winning on the 3rd of November, and the next day we saw as an example about 138,000 Michigan ballots that were "found" at 4 am on November 4th which all voted for Biden, which is an statistical impossibility.

VIDEO: Detroit Election Workers CHEER as GOP Election Monitor and GOP Lawyer Are Removed from TCF Center!

The American Republic is Dying To Thunderous Applause from Democrats.

What's more, despite lies from your mainstream lying media there were tens of thousands of votes in Arizona that were found to be fraudulent.

Below are some of the fraud that was found in the Arizona audit...

The (Arizona) audit actually found among other things 74,243 more ballots than ballots that were sent out...

They also found 11,326 individuals who did not show up on the voter rolls that were prepared the day after the election but showed up on a list on December 4 as having being registered and having voted. This means these 11,326 voters and their votes were added after the elections and on December 4th 2021...

They also found 18,000 people that voted and then were removed the day after the election...

They found several other clear indications of fraud, but the left-wing/mainstream media is once again lying, and again ATS is showing to be nothing but a propaganda machine for these lies...




edit on 7-10-2021 by ElectricUniverse because: add comment.



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 07:45 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Dims are moving fast due to mounting problems and revelations of their evil nature.




posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 07:48 PM
link   
a reply to: bastion

Oh and btw, you yourself refuted one of your claims. You claimed that the mayority of votes were for Biden, although it was reported that pretty much all votes after Novermber 3rd were for Biden, but you want to claim that the fraud (which occurred after november 3rd for the most part) was in favor of Trump when those votes were for Biden?... It's obvious you are the one talking gibberish... Must have learned it from your boss Biden... lol



edit on 7-10-2021 by ElectricUniverse because: add and correct comment.



posted on Oct, 7 2021 @ 09:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Don't just sing it old timer, provide at least some sort of source for your hairbrained ramblings.
And the french won't be sidekicks for long, you lot will get your #1sidekick status back soon.




It's "hare-brained", whippersnapper.

Do I really have to provide a source that the US spies on everybody?

Get real, man.

So do all intelligence agencies.


www.thefreedictionary.com...
Lol
Nope
But, absolutely expected.
Try again codger.
Being a sidekick is prestigious, with a long and glorious tradition; it is nothing to be ashamed of.


Did you not read your own source? "Hare" not "Hair"? Which would make no sense?

Do you not know what a "Hare" is?

As in "mad as a March Hare"?

Try again, whippersnapper.

Thanks for the most excellent example.
It is greatly appreciated.



posted on Oct, 8 2021 @ 06:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: bastion
I'm a UK lefty and have to agree with a lot of what the magazine says; though I think the American Empire has been colapsing from within for a while, at least as far as inner cities are concerned.

The election wasn't rigged though, that was established long ago.

Rod Liddle is a bit of a moron right wing journalist who doesn't do any research but writes 'rent-a-quotes' and controversial op-ed and opinion pieces for clickbait using the Daily Mail writing model. He doesn't have any credibility and it wasn't a news article or work endorsed by The Times. He doesn't believe most of what he writes, his career is just built on being paid for saying or writing controversial comments to cause arguments.
I’m Canadian and I believe the election was rigged without any shadow of doubt. I believe the pandemic played a huge role in making it all possible and I believe it was released onto the world intentionally because Donald J Trump was the only thing in the way of the NWO.



posted on Oct, 8 2021 @ 06:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: bastion
I'm a UK lefty and have to agree with a lot of what the magazine says; though I think the American Empire has been colapsing from within for a while, at least as far as inner cities are concerned.

The election wasn't rigged though, that was established long ago.

Rod Liddle is a bit of a moron right wing journalist who doesn't do any research but writes 'rent-a-quotes' and controversial op-ed and opinion pieces for clickbait using the Daily Mail writing model. He doesn't have any credibility and it wasn't a news article or work endorsed by The Times. He doesn't believe most of what he writes, his career is just built on being paid for saying or writing controversial comments to cause arguments.
I’m Canadian and I believe the election was rigged without any shadow of doubt. I believe the pandemic played a huge role in making it all possible and I believe it was released onto the world intentionally because Donald J Trump was the only thing in the way of the NWO.



posted on Oct, 8 2021 @ 07:59 PM
link   
a reply to: bastion

Also, the "definition of whom is right-wing, or left-wing" from countries like the UK differs wildly from the definition of what is a left-winger in the U.S. and other countries. I should know since I was born in a communist country, lived in Spain until I was 17 years of age, and then have been living in the U.S.

What for you counts as a "right-winger" from your own country to us is still left-wing.

Even "El Partido Popular" of Spain has turned more and more left-wing, and socialists took over in Spain which has tanked the economy there and has helped in the high rate of unemployment in Spain.

What to you is a "right-wing English politician", to us is a left-winger.



new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join