It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

GETTR - MAGA Trump-friendly Social Media Platform Launches July 4th 2021.

page: 28
41
<< 25  26  27    29  30 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 17 2021 @ 02:13 PM
link   
a reply to: UpThenDown

Beheadings and Muslim terrorists throwing gays off of roofs are fairly common videos. They are all over the place.



posted on Aug, 17 2021 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Charliebrowndog

its not the CCP i am bothered about its the CP, surely you are not advocating for CP to be freely available on the internet are you?



posted on Aug, 17 2021 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: UpThenDown

Absolutely not and I said besides the CP I am pretty open to most everything else because I think once you start cherry picking items it really becomes a slippery slope if you are for free speech or not. I'm not saying it is easy by any means and to be perfectly honest with you I wish social media had never been invented because it has enabled CP and trafficking to become easier and more accessible as well as dumbed down society but unfortunately that is not the world we live in.



posted on Aug, 17 2021 @ 02:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Charliebrowndog
I wish social media had never been invented


now aint that the truth

Thats why I refrain from using it



posted on Aug, 17 2021 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Freeborn
It would bore the tits off me.

Just a group of people posting stuff that everybody agrees with and pulling themselves stupid over the amount of likes, thumbs up or stars they get from like minded people.

What on earth is the point of that?
No dissention.
No alternative points of view.
No discussion and debate.

Just a whole load of 'yeah, you're right' blah blah blah.

For the record: I'd feel exactly the same about any exclusive left leaning forum.


Why do you think this platform will only be open to the people on the right? Is that your definition of a free and open platform? Oh, snap, of course that's the lefts definition, no opposing points of view allowed.



posted on Aug, 17 2021 @ 02:29 PM
link   



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 07:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

Should they have been? No. I'm a say whatever you want kinda of person.
But I'm also an accept the consequences of your actions kinda of person. That includes speech.
And I believe in businesses having the right to refuse service for any reason.

But if it was my platform would I ban people. Hell no.
But I'm not going to force my view on other business owners.

If you and I were smarter we would create our own truly free social media platform. It hasn't been done yet.
Unless you count bitcute. I mean do you ever read those commits? No censoring happening there.



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 07:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

Should they have been? No. I'm a say whatever you want kinda of person.
But I'm also an accept the consequences of your actions kinda of person. That includes speech.
And I believe in businesses having the right to refuse service for any reason.

But if it was my platform would I ban people. Hell no.
But I'm not going to force my view on other business owners.

If you and I were smarter we would create our own truly free social media platform. It hasn't been done yet.
Unless you count bitcute. I mean do you ever read those commits? No censoring happening there.



There are plenty of uncensored free for all sites.

No rational person is interested in them.



There are also plenty of sites that are actively censored by deranged fascist democrats.

No rational person is interested in these either.



THIS is the closest I've found to moderated free speech.

Rational people want a larger scale (and improved) version of ATS.


Is not an easy thing to accomplish.
(The managment, not the technology)

Is why I haven't tried it myself.

Yet.




edit on 15-9-2021 by Nunyabizisit because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 10:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Nunyabizisit


There are also plenty of sites that are actively censored by deranged fascist democrats.


There are also plenty of sites that are actively censored by deranged fascist Republicans.

Guess what the common denominator is?



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 12:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Nunyabizisit


There are also plenty of sites that are actively censored by deranged fascist democrats.


There are also plenty of sites that are actively censored by deranged fascist Republicans.

Guess what the common denominator is?




Name one site.

Or a a single 'fascist deranged republican'.



100% BS because you have nothing else.

Thank you for making it so clear to everyone.



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 12:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

Ok, I guess that was too hard a question for you?

Take a step backwards, take your blinkers off, take some time to look at what you see with an open mind and you might well be surprised at what you see.



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 12:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

Ok, I guess that was too hard a question for you?

Take a step backwards, take your blinkers off, take some time to look at what you see with an open mind and you might well be surprised at what you see.




It was based on a false assumption.

Because with ALL msm and most web sites being censored by democrats, you can't name even a single one on the other side.

(Though there must be a few somewhere)

Your position is absurd.

And your question so twisted that it can't be answered.

Lame tactics may work for you elsewhere.

Not here.




For those too ignorant to understand, this is a common expression used to point out that someone asked a question based on a false assumption, and not an accusation against any triggery user:


Do you still beat your wife?


edit on 15-9-2021 by Nunyabizisit because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 12:27 PM
link   
That's rather a rude thing to say isn't it?



a reply to: Nunyabizisit



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 12:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Nunyabizisit


Do you still beat you wife?


WTF is this bollocks?

Accusations of things like this in my world end up badly for people....please retract that, now!



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 12:32 PM
link   
a reply to: nonspecific

#ing downright outrageous is more accurate.

All very easy to be the clever #er from behind a monitor thousands of miles away from someone......



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 12:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Nunyabizisit


Do you still beat you wife?


WTF is this bollocks?

Accusations of things like this in my world end up badly for people....please retract that, now!




It wasn't an accusation.

Is a common expression used here to demonstrate the type of question you asked based on a false assumption.


Understand now?



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 12:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

You'd be understanding something if you'd ever make the #ing mistake of accusing me of something like that to my face.....but I KNOW you wouldn't have the balls.

UNDERSTAND NOW?

Apology please and full retraction.


edit on 15/9/21 by Freeborn because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 12:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Freeborn

It's an old legal joke about cross examination techniques, guys:

"Do you still beat your wife? - answer yes or no."

But I don't think he put it very well...



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 12:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

You'd be understanding something if you'd ever make the #ing mistake of accusing me of something like that to my face.....but I KNOW you wouldn't have the balls.

UNDERSTAND NOW?

Apology please and full retraction.





No. It was NOT an accusation.

Are you dense or just trolling.

Is COMMON expression used to say you asked a question based on false assumption that can't be answered, while implying something improper with the question itself.

Understand now?

Or just too dumb?
(That is an example of an actual accusation)



posted on Sep, 15 2021 @ 01:01 PM
link   
Also very rude.

Do you always speak to others with such a poor attitude?



a reply to: Nunyabizisit



new topics




 
41
<< 25  26  27    29  30 >>

log in

join