It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What questions still exist about January 6th?

page: 6
15
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 31 2021 @ 04:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

can't have your voice heard if you aren't a part of the conversation

54 to 35. they sure did

clearly you have some kind of skewed reality



posted on May, 31 2021 @ 04:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

pretty sure just a funny comment lol hence the LOL at the end



posted on May, 31 2021 @ 05:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: OzBoomer77
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

can't have your voice heard if you aren't a part of the conversation

54 to 35. they sure did

clearly you have some kind of skewed reality



That was the vote for my side to join an investigation.

That was not a vote to prevent dems from doing it anyway.

My side dosen't currently have enough votes to even attempt to block any investigation.

Keep trying though, we might be educating a few lurkers.



posted on May, 31 2021 @ 05:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

ohh your arguing semantics and bad ones at that

lol no you need 60 votes so yes they blocked it

yes they can have the investigation but want it to be bipartisan hence the giving them the chance to vote for it in the senate. and they voted against it not only that they are going to filibuster it. hours of crazy rants

so seems you are living in a skewed reality

republicans blocked it, end of story



posted on May, 31 2021 @ 05:18 PM
link   
a reply to: OzBoomer77


They blocked a 'special' type of investigation that would be run by both sides.

My side does not have the votes to prevent ANY traditional dem investigation.

I am not the one arguing semantics here.

Refusing to join a sham investigation does NOT equal blocking that sham investigation in any way.

But I agree that leftists sure seem to think that it does.

Perhaps the TV told them so?



posted on May, 31 2021 @ 05:20 PM
link   
Everything's dandy, the DOJ is investigating and they have the power of "conviction" !! 🚨😃



posted on May, 31 2021 @ 05:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: OzBoomer77
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

pretty sure just a funny comment lol hence the LOL at the end



I don't know what you are responding to here.

But just out of curiosity, does that mean can I say the most vile things about certain leftists that I can come up with?

As long as there is a lol at the end?

And people won't lump me in with the absurdity right?



posted on May, 31 2021 @ 05:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

And we are talking about the investigation passed by the house NOT any other investigation

thats the one that needs 60 votes and the republicans blocked it

if the dems want to just run an investigation they would have just done it, thats not what they want and have stated so

but we all know what the play book is for the repubs. block it. make the dems do a dem investigation and when the results come out that it was trump his croonies and his supporters, scream to the high heaven that it's all rigged, they weren't involved and partisan just to suit their base and the crazy conspiracies.

time and time again, more crying from right wingers. just like the vote in texas where the state dems pulled a republican play and WAAAAAAAAAAAAAA it's pretty funny actually.

So no semantics here just in your face truth about how the republicans blocked a bipartisan investigation



posted on May, 31 2021 @ 05:30 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

and thats good but are you going to accept the results of the that investigation if it comes out it was trumpers??



posted on May, 31 2021 @ 05:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: OzBoomer77
a reply to: xuenchen

and thats good but are you going to accept the results of the that investigation if it comes out it was trumpers??


Hypothetical "what" "if" 👀

The Congress Committees can investigate too any time they want "to" 👀








posted on May, 31 2021 @ 05:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: OzBoomer77
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

And we are talking about the investigation passed by the house NOT any other investigation

thats the one that needs 60 votes and the republicans blocked it

if the dems want to just run an investigation they would have just done it, thats not what they want and have stated so

but we all know what the play book is for the repubs. block it. make the dems do a dem investigation and when the results come out that it was trump his croonies and his supporters, scream to the high heaven that it's all rigged, they weren't involved and partisan just to suit their base and the crazy conspiracies.

time and time again, more crying from right wingers. just like the vote in texas where the state dems pulled a republican play and WAAAAAAAAAAAAAA it's pretty funny actually.

So no semantics here just in your face truth about how the republicans blocked a bipartisan investigation



I don't disagree with many of your facts here, but see motives a lot more clearly.

What dems did in the house was the unusual part. Investigations like this aren't usually started that way here.

That was done because dems thought they and media could force my side to give this 'special' investigation political cover until 2023.

That playbook is already known and won't work anymore.

Nothing is stopping any kind of more traditional investigation by DOJ or house committees.

My side is actually encouraging it.

But suspects dems will fold again to prevent the rest of the evidence from being seen and destroying the entire dem party.



posted on May, 31 2021 @ 05:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: OzBoomer77
a reply to: xuenchen

and thats good but are you going to accept the results of the that investigation if it comes out it was trumpers??




I just might, bring on the investigation!

Dems aren't that stupid.

Or suicidal.



posted on Jun, 1 2021 @ 01:34 AM
link   
a reply to: MiddleInsite

How many insurrections have you seen? I've seen 1 real insurrection (Turkey) and one riot. I did see the seattle city council open the doors to the courthouse and give the mayors address to antifa and then lead a match to the mayor's house. So, yes.. own it please. I served at the CHOP in Seattle which was no less than an insurrection.



posted on Jun, 1 2021 @ 06:08 PM
link   
Who killed Ashli Babbitt. That is the only question I still have. Unarmed. US Vet. No threat.



posted on Jun, 8 2021 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
Quite a few folks seemed to be upset that there wasn't going to be another investigation into Jan 6th. Several have been done so far, and we have learned that John Sullivan was an ANTIFA activist, that pretended to be a Trump supporter and was directly behind Ashley Babbit when she was shot, he even was the one to get the footage of the incident. He was paid by CNN for his work. We know that Office Sicknic died of natural causes and his death has nothing to do with the riot.

The only questions I may have left is were any other protesters/rioters tied to the left wing establishment as John was. Everything else seems to have been answered. Which seems to confirm that the only reason to make another inquiry would be to keep this in the forefront for another election cycle. As it's a crime to waste a great gift such as this was to the left.

link to article on John Sullivan

Yet, in footage streamed to his followers on Discord, Sullivan, who uses the name “Jayden X” on the app, can be heard inciting violence from inside the U.S. Capitol and boasting about breaking a window.

“If we don’t get in, we’re going to burn this sh*t down,” he gloats. “Let’s go! This sh*t’s ours. F*ck yeah. I can’t believe this is reality. We accomplished this sh*t. We did this sh*t together.

“I didn’t know I hit [the window] that hard. No one got that on camera… F*ck the blue! F*ck the blue!”

This footage comes from a source who wishes to remain anonymous for security reasons.


Moments after Sullivan captured Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt getting shot and killed in the Capitol, a blonde woman accompanying Sullivan who appears to be his accomplice, Jade Sacker, gleefully exclaims, “We did it!”

“You were right! We did it,” she boasts.

“Dude, I was trying to tell you. I couldn’t say much,” Sullivan replies. “Is this not going to be the best film you’ve ever made in your life?”


So please explain what other things we need to learn about this event, and maybe we will find that indeed another look is warranted.


Update - June 8, 2021

BIG JANUARY 6th PROTEST report released.

Source: www.msn.com...

Liberal's aren't happy. They can't find TRUMP implicated therein.

Since President Trump wasn't impeached by the Senate for any role in the melee, what the hell do the idiots at the Washington Post expect?



posted on Jun, 8 2021 @ 02:58 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

All about optics and MSM headlines. The failure came from the Mayor and Pelosi. If there was to be such an uprising and the 'intel' was there why not be prepared.



posted on Jun, 9 2021 @ 04:55 PM
link   
a reply to: wdkirk


" Rep. Devin Nunes Calls For Ashli Babbit’s Murderer to Be Named & 14,000 Hours Of Capitol Security Footage To Be Released . "

The TRUTH Nevers Sleeps . WE WILL Find it Out in the Not to Distant Future........






www.infowars.com...


edit on 9-6-2021 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join