It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Federal Grand Jury To Hear Evidence - World Trade Center 9-11 Was Controlled Demolition.

page: 31
33
<< 28  29  30   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 24 2019 @ 04:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: democracydemo

originally posted by: Sillyolme
This thread was started six months ago.
What was the outcome of the grand jury testimony?
Is it still going on?


Grand jury outcome is not out. It is still going on, in secrecy.

To what, how, when, who and why i would recommend answers from Mick Harrison:



Still zero evidence of WTC CD

The grand jury outcome my never come out if the grand jury tells the prosecutor to pass..... it will just disappear into the background.




posted on May, 25 2019 @ 09:11 AM
link   
That the USA is not moving on the petition suggests he is in on the cover-up. His delay or refusal shows the government has something to hide.

Old news.



posted on May, 25 2019 @ 12:40 PM
link   
FYI, might be nothing, or connected to topic at hand.

wtcdata.nist.gov... has been down for at least a week now.

For those not familiar to this link, it stores a plethora of images, videos and sims concerning 9-11. (including missed and ignored evidence by NIST itself).



posted on May, 25 2019 @ 05:23 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

I see in your linked video still the bits at the bottom of the towers still stand, albeit a bit bent.

How did a gravitational collapse miss the structure directly below the main mass?



posted on May, 25 2019 @ 06:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: democracydemo
FYI, might be nothing, or connected to topic at hand.

wtcdata.nist.gov... has been down for at least a week now.

For those not familiar to this link, it stores a plethora of images, videos and sims concerning 9-11. (including missed and ignored evidence by NIST itself).



But you cannot cite the missed evidence and create a logical argument something other than drooping and contraction floor trusses caused the outer columns to bow inward and buckled to initiate the collapse? The bowing and buckling is part of the video record. Where is the video of columns being cut?





The Pre-collapse and Inward Bowing of WTC 2

www.metabunk.org...

edit on 25-5-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on May, 25 2019 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Kester

Like to state what structure? You mean the vertical columns the truth movement claimed was cut on every floor to achieve the witnesses collapse rate?

Or you talking about the stronger thicker walled sections that didn’t collapse where the outer vertical columns dropped down to an arch than spit into two large columns below the arch? The double column sections that were stronger up to the arches that didn’t topple in after the loss of lateral support of the stripped away floor system? Like the longer vertical section above the arches?

Thank you. More proof the structure didn’t collapse down through the vertical columns. More proof the floor system was stripped away from the vertical column.





Collapse of the World Trade Centre
www.cs.mcgill.ca...

The situation was similar in 2 WTC. In both towers, perimeter columns and floors were also weakened by the heat of the fires, causing the floors to sag and exerting an inward force on exterior walls of the building.
At 9:59 am, the sagging floors finally caused the eastern face of 2 WTC to buckle, transferring its loads back to the failing core through the hat truss and initiating the collapse. At 10:28 the south wall of 1 WTC buckled, with similar consequences. After collapse ensued, the total collapse of the towers was inevitable due to the enormous weight of the towers above the impact areas.
A combination of three factors allowed the north tower to remain standing longer: the region of impact was higher (so the gravity load on the most damaged area was lighter); the speed of the plane was lower (so there was less impact damage); and the affected floors had had their fire proofing partially upgraded.

edit on 25-5-2019 by neutronflux because: Added words to clarify.

edit on 25-5-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed.

edit on 25-5-2019 by neutronflux because: Added more

edit on 25-5-2019 by neutronflux because: Fixed more



posted on May, 25 2019 @ 07:32 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Seems like proof the towers didn't 'fall down'.

Google The Core Comprises Steel Beams And Columns With Reinforced Concrete Infill Panels.



posted on May, 25 2019 @ 07:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kester
a reply to: neutronflux

Seems like proof the towers didn't 'fall down'.

Google The Core Comprises Steel Beams And Columns With Reinforced Concrete Infill Panels.


Well, the towers didn’t fall up....

How about you state a clear theory and provide supporting arguments and evidence?

The towers didn’t fall. The outer columns buckled because of bowing. The sections of the towers above the buckling fell into the building below busting floor connections as the mass fell. The vertical columns toppled after the lateral support of the floor systems were lost.
edit on 25-5-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



new topics

top topics



 
33
<< 28  29  30   >>

log in

join