It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

1 photo - 1 fact

page: 1
8
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 01:29 AM
link   
Curious.

If you had to pick the most creepy, eeriest, disturbing photo of 9/11 which one would you pick?

Also, if you had to pick one fact that in your opinion is the ultimate proof there was a conspiracy what fact would you provide?




posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 01:40 AM
link   
seems that the horrible phenomena around 911 are somewhat...entertaining for you?
need any more 'curious' fotos..not enough already? Not enough lies still going on ?
don`t you see how long the arm of 911 still reaches today?
still need more (dumb) infotainment?



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 01:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Ghostsinthefog



Take the time to count the windows to get an idea how huge that fireball is.

The aircraft were shredded as they went in to the buildings.

That fireball is the fuel load of the aircraft being consumed EXTERNAL to the building.

And ... it did not last long ... as kerosene tends to go bang ... and that's all it does.

Don't mind the walking thingy BTW. It was added in to make the Meme.

P

edit on 9/11/2018 by pheonix358 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 01:54 AM
link   
The aftermath of the jumpers on the paving. That's horrible.

That or the Falling Man.

Not a photo, but one of the things that really stuck with me, was Kevin Cosgrove's final call. That scream never left me. That's fear we can't even imagine.



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 02:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Ghostsinthefog





The ultimate proof that it was a conspiracy...
edit on 9-11-2018 by szino9 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 03:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Ghostsinthefog

You ask but don’t give. What’s yours?



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 03:42 AM
link   
a reply to: pheonix358

I guess you don’t understand physics and fall for the pseudoscience of the truth movement?

Each wing of the jets could carry over 30,000 pounds of fuel. Each wing tip tank of the three tanks in each wing has a capacity of over 2,000 pounds.

The mass and speed of the jets gave ample speed to smash into the columns and break the welds that held the segment of vertical columns together.

So, where was the thousands of gallons of fuel stage to create your supposed staged fireball. For an “external fireball”?

So how should thousands of gallons of flammable liquid act that is virtually incompressible and transmits pressure undiminished?

How fast should a spray of liquid burn when the force of impact caused the fuel to atomize like a massive fuel injector?

Anymore false arguments based on pseudoscience and mere innuendo? With total disregard for reality? The actual design and physics of the large jets that struck the towers?

edit on 9-11-2018 by neutronflux because: Adde.

edit on 9-11-2018 by neutronflux because: Fixed and added more

edit on 9-11-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 03:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Ghostsinthefog

Might ask the members of families that potential saw the moment of their loved ones deaths on 9/11?
edit on 9-11-2018 by neutronflux because: Fixed more

edit on 9-11-2018 by neutronflux because: Fixed more



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 04:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Ghostsinthefog



The spire.

A structural steel column that didn't melt or buckle, but turned to dust. This one fact disproves jet fuel and thermite in one swoop.



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 04:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: Ghostsinthefog



The spire.

A structural steel column that didn't melt or buckle, but turned to dust. This one fact disproves jet fuel and thermite in one swoop.


all the phenomena can only be explained with a small subterranean nuclear demolition device.
it was turned into particles and left too little debris..just to name the most obvious.



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 05:07 AM
link   
a reply to: anti72

How does a low resolution photo after a dusty collapse with dust blowing off a column imply nukes.

One, please state what nuclear reaction caused steel to turn to dust.

Two: if there was that much radiation then everyone in Manhattan would have died within hours from radiation poisoning.

Three, why was there not widespread contamination.

Four. Why was the slurry wall around the WTC not breached. Left intact.

Five, why is there no video, audio, seismic evidence of a shockwave.

Six. Please state from seismic and EMP evidence the exact time the supposed nuke was detonated.

Any more theories totally lacking in credibility and solely based on pseudoscience?
edit on 9-11-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 05:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: Ghostsinthefog



The spire.

A structural steel column that didn't melt or buckle, but turned to dust. This one fact disproves jet fuel and thermite in one swoop.


The columns had identification marks on them that were used to identify the columns as recovered. Like to cite which columns evaporated from existence?

Something like 1,400,000 tons of rubble was removed from the WTC.

How did columns supposedly evaporated from existence, but left less massive floor connections behind for examination?



Failure of Welded Floor Truss Connections from the Exterior Wall during Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers
app.aws.org...


Characterization of Submerged Arc Welds from the World Trade Center Towers: As- Deposited Welds and Failures Associated with Impact Damage of the Exterior Columns
files.aws.org...


Do you have anymore false narratives?



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 05:32 AM
link   
The vid of no debris on the grounds of Shanksville and the a b c reporter at the pent....with his live shot saying the same....no debris by

Will neutronflush show his artificial mind koo in this thread?



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 06:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: GBP/JPY
The vid of no debris on the grounds of Shanksville and the a b c reporter at the pent....with his live shot saying the same....no debris by

Will neutronflush show his artificial mind koo in this thread?


Would you like to actually cite and link to sources documenting individuals saying there was no wreckage?

Or you here just to use innuendo with no actual facts?
edit on 9-11-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 06:40 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

You will have a great time of it when President Trump eventually releases the truth.

It is coming, but not for a while methinks.

P



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 07:48 AM
link   




And the "plane" hitting the Pentagon. Biggest buncha crap I ever heard in my life.
edit on 11/9/2018 by Slinki because: (no reason given)

edit on 11/9/2018 by Slinki because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 07:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Slinki




And the "plane" hitting the Pentagon.


Seeing those shots of the planes about to hit, no matter what angle, always gives me chiils. The people on board know what is going to happen. Unimaginable fear.



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 07:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Ghostsinthefog

Not a photo but audio




posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 07:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Spacespider
a reply to: Ghostsinthefog

Not a photo but audio



Still brings tears to my eyes. To this very day.



posted on Nov, 9 2018 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux


How does a low resolution photo after a dusty collapse with dust blowing off a column imply nukes. 


🤣😂😆😅
You know damn well that doesn't show "dust blowing off a column" Your reach is hilarious though.

I never said anything about nukes. I'm surprised you didn't say your typical "laser beams from space" line.

Does anyone else here honestly see "dust falling off a column"? Or do you see a column disintegrating into dust?



new topics

top topics



 
8
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join