It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

ALERT - We Will Only See a MODIFIED and REDACTED I.G. Report on 6.14.2018.

page: 1
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:06 AM
link   
Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Tomorrow is when the 2nd Installment of the DOJ's Office of Inspector General Report is made public. This Installment, is over 400 pages in length, and has been compiled by over 200 OIG investigators and staffers, working on this project since early January of 2017...for 18 months.

This particular report is focused on DOJ and FBI actions/lack-of-actions during the 2016 Presidential election cycle, as they relate to attempting to HELP candidate Hillary Clinton win, while simultaneously working to HURT candidate Donald Trump's chances of winning.

Several TOP LEVEL FBI and DOJ people will be implicated with WRONG-DOING.

Tonight, White House "Insider", known as "Q", is alerting America to the fact that AAG Rod Rosenstein has SCRUBBED and REDACTED the report.

As a result, there are now 3 versions.

1. The original, non-redacted version.

2. A Rod Rosenstein modified, un-redacted version.

3. A Rod Rosenstein modified & redacted version.

SOURCE: See Message #1496 at: qanon.pub...

As pointed out in message #1496, President Trump is reviewing all 3 versions, along with some classified I.G. summary notes. Scheduled for release to the public at 3pm(EDT) tomorrow (6.14.2018), is VERSION #3.

Are you OK with only seeing the MODIFIED and REDACTED version of this Inspector General Report, ATS family?

If the full I.G. Report is not published tomorrow, the President is willing to declassify and release the original, if enough "protest" is generated. Just letting everyone know this, in case action on our part is needed.

-CareWeMust


Edit to Add: The Inspector General was tasked to conduct this investigation in January 2017...mostly by Democrats mad at James Comey. Here is a 1.12.2017 NBC article, describing why it was begun, and what the original tasks/goals were.

NBC Article: www.nbcnews.com...


edit on 6/14/2018 by carewemust because: Added NBC article for reference purposes.




posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:15 AM
link   
Ahhh. So let’s get together and make up three versions to say whatever we want them to say, so when the the redacted version drops, we can parrot them around like they’re real.

Is there anyone out there who actually thought this wouldn’t be redacted?



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:19 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Big Bump, cwm. This thread should grow legs as
long as Rod's wooden nose.


I also think the stink of "Nothing about me to see
here, I redacted nothing incriminating about my-
self"
is capable of knocking a 15 year old buzzard
off a full, ripened honey wagon at 50 paces.
In Tucson. On Solstice Day: close enough for me.

EDIT:: But watch the LSM lap it up like frozen custard...


edit on 14-6-2018 by derfreebie because: I think I want to return as a monstrous uncovered truth



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:19 AM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

If someone were implicated in wrongdoing in the report and were able to remove any references to said wrongdoing, would you want to know?



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:20 AM
link   
a reply to: underwerks


Why should a REPORT be redacted? It's not the original documents that were used to build the report.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:22 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust



Why should a REPORT be redacted? It's not the original documents that were used to build the report.


Why sit on the fence if the full report isn't published?



the President is willing to declassify and release the original, if enough "protest" is generated



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:22 AM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

Is there anyone out there who actually thought this wouldn’t be redacted

Yes...the assholes over at GLP




posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:23 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Sooo many things I could say to shame you right now.
Dude just go hang with your Trump shine and leave ATS.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:24 AM
link   
When the public gets to see the full version, the parts that they wanted to hide will be front and center. Let them push out a scrubbed version first, it only highlights the good parts for later. It also puts the ball in Trump's court, he can declassify when he wants, like at election time.

These idiots will never learn, Trump wins.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks
Ahhh. So let’s get together and make up three versions to say whatever we want them to say, so when the the redacted version drops, we can parrot them around like they’re real.

Is there anyone out there who actually thought this wouldn’t be redacted?


Yep. I want the whole truth regardless of what it says.

This is foundational to the fabric of law enforcement in this nation regardless of where the chips fall. I suppose it can always be declassified, but if we're not going to get the whole truth in order to make informed decisions about the course of our nation, then I fail to how this is of any use, except to beat each other over the head with it politically.

Yeah, I'm not buying this one either.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:28 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Well, someone better step up to the plate, and they will, crying fowl. Then they need to use their powers because Congress is the only power the people have. They haven't used it for at least a decade.

i am sick of this power play and cover ups to portect crooks.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:28 AM
link   
Edit cause I looked at another ATS thread I have up
edit on 14-6-2018 by liveandlearn because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:31 AM
link   
Rod will be impeached if that happens.

2-3pm EST we'll see.

Trow the bum out on his ass!!!








posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:33 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Everything is known.
Not everything will be revealed
at this time.

Think optics.
Think leverage.

Total Informational Awareness.
I warned You All about this years ago.
Enjoy Winning. Praise God Almighty.

S&F
edit on 14-6-2018 by Wildmanimal because: S&F

edit on 14-6-2018 by Wildmanimal because: Add Line

edit on 14-6-2018 by Wildmanimal because: typos



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:40 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust


POTUS in possession of (and reviewing)


It seem that if the redacted version is released, there is only one person a sane individual can blame for not releasing the un-redacted version.

Trump has the un-redacted version in his possession....whoops.


edit on 14/6/18 by Chadwickus because: deep state!!



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: underwerks

If someone were implicated in wrongdoing in the report and were able to remove any references to said wrongdoing, would you want to know?


On a positive note, what we're NOT able to see will not affect the potential CRIMINAL REFERRALS that will be sent to Prosecutor John Huber.
edit on 6/14/2018 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

Careful.
Think leverage.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: carewemust



Why should a REPORT be redacted? It's not the original documents that were used to build the report.


Why sit on the fence if the full report isn't published?



the President is willing to declassify and release the original, if enough "protest" is generated


Unfortunately, we won't know if the FULL report is not published. But President Trump will. His staff is comparing all 3 versions tonight.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: carewemust

Sooo many things I could say to shame you right now.
Dude just go hang with your Trump shine and leave ATS.




Why say anything then?



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 12:49 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Horowitz and potentially Huber will also know what has been redacted from the published version.



new topics




 
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join