It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The Serious 9/11 Arguments Compilation.

page: 64
<< 61  62  63   >>

log in


posted on Oct, 14 2018 @ 05:16 PM
A reply to: neutronflux

Good old Name calling. Btw, what's a hack?
Forbidden under ATS rules.

Same old and stale texts.
Try to do better.
This is not worth any serious attention.
READ the offered abundant evidence for once.
Instead of obsessive posting text-repeats, that have been clearly debunked.

posted on Oct, 14 2018 @ 10:49 PM

originally posted by: LaBTop

It's a VERY sophisticated and thorough video analysis of the two videos shot by DoD security camera boots

Other Truthers disagree with this analysis.

Video research by Wayne Coste, narrated by David Chandler -- Analysis of the security camera videos showing the plane crossing the lawn at the Pentagon.

posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 07:53 AM
a reply to: LaBTop

And you still posted falsehoods of seismic evidence of CD. And you still posted falsehoods somehow the “evidence” was removed within three days of 9/11? Somehow first responders dug under 11 and 29 stories of rubble?

You say there was no buckling when it’s right there in the video evidence and reported by police crews from helicopters?

But you say with all seriousness fire related collapse based on reasonable assumptions was impossible? Based on what published study fire related collapse is impossible? While there are at least three studies that concludes fire related collapse was the most probable cause.

While there is zero evidence of CD from the video, audio, seismic, thermal imaging, and metallurgical evidence?

Please cite what study claims the collapse of WTC 1,2, and 7 was most probably CD? Which is different than trying any BS to say fire collapse was impossible.
edit on 15-10-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed

<< 61  62  63   >>

log in