posted on Oct, 15 2018 @ 07:53 AM
a reply to: LaBTop
And you still posted falsehoods of seismic evidence of CD. And you still posted falsehoods somehow the “evidence” was removed within three days
of 9/11? Somehow first responders dug under 11 and 29 stories of rubble?
You say there was no buckling when it’s right there in the video evidence and reported by police crews from helicopters?
But you say with all seriousness fire related collapse based on reasonable assumptions was impossible? Based on what published study fire related
collapse is impossible? While there are at least three studies that concludes fire related collapse was the most probable cause.
While there is zero evidence of CD from the video, audio, seismic, thermal imaging, and metallurgical evidence?
Please cite what study claims the collapse of WTC 1,2, and 7 was most probably CD? Which is different than trying any BS to say fire collapse was
edit on 15-10-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed