It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New images shows something unimaginable HUGE is buried beneath ancient Baalbek

page: 7
120
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 10:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Harte

Plus, the Romans used oxen as draft animals which could pull wheeled wagons with a weight of 1.5 tons. They did not have to rely on manpower alone.




posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 02:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Byrd
a reply to: Harte

Plus, the Romans used oxen as draft animals which could pull wheeled wagons with a weight of 1.5 tons. They did not have to rely on manpower alone.


Pulling is one thing, but how did they lift 1,000 tonns upwards many feet?

-MM
edit on 19-6-2017 by MerkabaMeditation because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Harte

Thanks, Harte, but just how did they lift a 1,000 ton block upwards to place the blocks?

-MM



posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 04:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Harte

Thanks, Harte, but just how did they lift a 1,000 ton block upwards to place the blocks?

-MM

Two things I see I need to repeat:

1) NO stone in that temple weighs 1,000 tons.

2) Not a single stone of the trilithon had to be lifted upward during the construction by any stretch of the imagination.

Harte



posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 04:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Harte

Thanks, Harte, but just how did they lift a 1,000 ton block upwards to place the blocks?

-MM


Haven't read the entire thread but I'd guess they could do it with a pulley system attaching the rope and pulley to the top of whatever they have built and having the oxen with a harness attached to the rope.

I am assuming they could have had a pulley as well though.



posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 04:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Harte

Thanks, Harte, but just how did they lift a 1,000 ton block upwards to place the blocks?

-MM

Two things I see I need to repeat:

1) NO stone in that temple weighs 1,000 tons.

2) Not a single stone of the trilithon had to be lifted upward during the construction by any stretch of the imagination.

Harte


But how about these approx. 557 ton blocks twenty feet above ground level then? How did they lift these up to place them on the wall?
Source: www.ancient-origins.net...


-MM

edit on 19-6-2017 by MerkabaMeditation because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 08:24 PM
link   
Universal language math is....
Pulley Mechanical advantage Formula



posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 09:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Harte

Thanks, Harte, but just how did they lift a 1,000 ton block upwards to place the blocks?

-MM

Two things I see I need to repeat:

1) NO stone in that temple weighs 1,000 tons.

2) Not a single stone of the trilithon had to be lifted upward during the construction by any stretch of the imagination.

Harte


But how about these approx. 557 ton blocks twenty feet above ground level then? How did they lift these up to place them on the wall?
Source: www.ancient-origins.net...


-MM

I don't care to explain it to you for a third time.

Harte



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 01:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Harte

Thanks, Harte, but just how did they lift a 1,000 ton block upwards to place the blocks?

-MM

Two things I see I need to repeat:

1) NO stone in that temple weighs 1,000 tons.

2) Not a single stone of the trilithon had to be lifted upward during the construction by any stretch of the imagination.

Harte


But how about these approx. 557 ton blocks twenty feet above ground level then? How did they lift these up to place them on the wall?
Source: www.ancient-origins.net...


-MM

I don't care to explain it to you for a third time.

Harte


I'm sorry, but I've only seen you explained how to *pull* large blocks and not how to *lift* them.

-MM



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 07:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Harte

Thanks, Harte, but just how did they lift a 1,000 ton block upwards to place the blocks?

-MM

Two things I see I need to repeat:

1) NO stone in that temple weighs 1,000 tons.

2) Not a single stone of the trilithon had to be lifted upward during the construction by any stretch of the imagination.

Harte



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 09:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

I'm sorry, but I've only seen you explained how to *pull* large blocks and not how to *lift* them.

-MM


Same way people lift heavy objects everywhere: place a ramp that leads to where you want to go and pull.

But the Romans did invent the lifting crane before this time period and there's depictions of them using it to lift materials at construction sites.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Harte

Thanks, Harte, but just how did they lift a 1,000 ton block upwards to place the blocks?

-MM

Two things I see I need to repeat:

1) NO stone in that temple weighs 1,000 tons.

2) Not a single stone of the trilithon had to be lifted upward during the construction by any stretch of the imagination.

Harte


Have look at the picture below of these 557 ton blocks at Baalbek, they have been lifted up about 20 feet into their place. These are the blocks I've been asking you to explain how were lifted, do you have any idea of how those blocks were lifted upwards? If they were not lifted, then how did they place them in this wall?

Source: www.ancient-origins.net...

-MM
edit on 20-6-2017 by MerkabaMeditation because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-6-2017 by MerkabaMeditation because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:24 PM
link   



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: Harte

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: Harte

Thanks, Harte, but just how did they lift a 1,000 ton block upwards to place the blocks?

-MM

Two things I see I need to repeat:

1) NO stone in that temple weighs 1,000 tons.

2) Not a single stone of the trilithon had to be lifted upward during the construction by any stretch of the imagination.

Harte


Have look at the picture below of these 557 ton blocks at Baalbek, they have been lifted up about 20 feet into their place. These are the blocks I've been asking you to explain how were lifted, do you have any idea of how those blocks were lifted upwards? If they were not lifted, then how did they place them in this wall?

Source: www.ancient-origins.net...

-MM

What part of "they weren't lifted" is confusing you?

Harte



posted on Jun, 21 2017 @ 04:01 AM
link   
Only have to lift one end if you had to..Then pull or push.Humans had thousands of years to figure stuff out before the pyramids.How quickly did humans need to figure out how to build Highrises?



posted on Jun, 21 2017 @ 08:14 PM
link   
There are numerous "Lewis" lifting appliance holes in the Roman blocks to show that they were at least lifting most of the blocks at the site, although according to Lohman several blocks have had there faces abraded to remove the unsightly holes after being placed into their final position. So the Romans did lift some of these multi-ton beasts. I put it to the doubters, many of the Roman blocks encompassing the peristyle weigh in the 450 ton range, and the technology to move and lift those would have also moved and lifted the 800-ton blocks of the Trilithon, only the scale would have changed. Instead of 4 capstans you may have had 8, or even a dozen. Ragget depicted a hypothetical lifting apparatus for the monoliths that relied on known Roman technology and even calculated how many Lewis lifting appliance holes would have been needed, based on the shear strength of their iron and that of the blocks. Of course this doesn't mean the 800-ton blocks were ever lifted, as they are foundation blocks, and grades and slopes would have been altered to accommodate their movement. Remember, the Romans in their time flattened entire hilltops for the sake of their grand designs.



posted on Jun, 22 2017 @ 06:28 PM
link   

Pr 8:22 ¶ The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old.
23 I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was.
24 When there were no depths, I was brought forth; when there were no fountains abounding with water.


If this is verse can be taken as correct and in chronology

1) the earth is a lot older that 6,000 plus year.

2) Originally there was no water on earth it was in fountains.

3) Lucifer tried to exalt a throne which I believe was originally on this earth and was built by commission from God Almighty to exalt his son.

This could be a remnant of that original throne city that was why God flooded the earth as we see in Genesis 1:2



new topics

top topics



 
120
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join